Cod is horrible and overrated, nothing else to say.
Halo
CoD
SECRET OPTION 3: BATTLEFIELD
Cod is horrible and overrated, nothing else to say.
...
I honestly only play cod it CAN be fast paced when people aren't camping.(I'm not implying camping isn't only in cod.) I tried bf3 it just seemed to go slow...and I actually own halo reach, but when I tried it I couldn't find any matches because I didn't have any of the dlc maps.
I may be stupid but I'm not an idiot.
Halo over COD. Why? Because COD's gameplay is horrible (Yes I have played it and no I didn't suck at it).
The game is (to me) just like it was when the "Modern Warfare" series came, the newer games where just a different story in a different place and the multiplayer just hasn't changed at all.
In Halo on the other hand, I see new things being added in every Halo game that comes. It has change in scenery, something COD lacks.
Pinky - DD667 - Tebbe - ninjakurtis - Spychato - Nightmare Moon - Mana-FirePontoty - Justice - Silverrida - Discord - GlowInTheDark
After watching videos for the up and coming CoD Black Ops II and Halo 4 I would have to say Halo 4 looks a lot more interesting. CoD was a game that was originally made to be based off of real warfare while trying to be as realistic as possible and sticking to true events. In recent CoD games they have completely tossed that concept out the window and are now making a game that has guns that would never EVER work in real life. If you take a look at one of the snipers they show in a preview video of the campaign the clip loads into the back of the gun with the bullets aiming down. So, what they are telling me is that somewhere inside that gun there is a contraption that turns the bullets so that they are facing forward so it is possible for the gun to shoot? I think not.
As for Halo, this was a game based on fantasy and they are still to this day doing a great job at fulfilling that. Not only are the map graphics better than CoDs but the loose/free gameplay (by that I mean easy movement, firing, and larger maps with a larger variety of weapons in each level) makes the gameplay much more fun and adds actual strategy to the game while CoD is basicly whoever pulls the trigger first. Another reason why I think Halo is better is because they actually add new content EVERY game. All of the CoD games are basicly the same (even with graphics starting from MW2 - MW3 including Black Ops) just with different storylines that still present the same basic challenges. Halo on the otherhand adds quite a few new features to every game, much more for the up coming Halo 4 than even the others with the new line of enemies.
That's all my personal opinion though, I do play both games and I do think they are both great just Halo seems to have more of an edge as for a greater game.
CoD takes no skill, the gameplay sucks, and no I don't suck at it.
Halo takes skill.
Nuff said.
PONT ~ PINKY ~ PAT ~ AX6 ~ RED ~ DARKE (come back soon) ~ ATOMIC CAT ~ TBBM ~
Battlefielddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd all the way. Every game takes skill btw.
I AM HEAVY WEAPONS LEMON, AND THIS IS MY LEMON ;_;
i cant finish a cod campaign because its boring (like all fps campaigns [imo])
and chopper gunners can be difficult to get in a shitty game with shit hit detection (srsly blops is worst cod)
and y do people say cod take skill
srsly go record yourself right now getting a penta-moab
oh
you cant?
alright then.
also, just fyi, i would have picked battlefield but the title is halo 4 vs. cod not halo 4 vs. cod vs. battlefield
Halo 4 > Body Odour 2
K
EDIT: There is no way there are more votes for CoD. No way in hell. IT'S A LIE. IT'S BLACK MAGIC.
Shades of colors are all I see
Shapes and colors are all I feel
Roses are red, You better get ready.
Bend your ass over, UR GETTING SPAGHETTI