Halo
CoD
SECRET OPTION 3: BATTLEFIELD
How is this fair when according to the poll you're comparing one single game that isn't even out yet to a whole series? I prefer COD, but HALO is better.
COD doesn't suck and it's annoying how everyone says it does. Just because the newer games aren't as good doesn't mean the older are too. Modern Warfare, World at War... they're great games.
Edit = Also, as good as Battlefield is it's nothing compared to COD or HALO... I've always realized that people say "All CODs are the same" when all Battlefield are the same. All they add is new graphics and a couple of textures/gamemodes etc.
Last edited by Chip; 16th August 2012 at 05:30 PM.
Sorry if I wasn't clear(?), but I don't like the Modern warfare 2 nor the 3.
The modern warfare 1 was good, I liked the campaign.
About world at war, I don't remember since I played it long time ago, I liked the zombies btw.
By now the best (in my opinion) is the Black ops.
So I'm not saying all of the games from CoD series are bad.
Still, I prefer Halo by far (Halo 3 to be more specific, I don't like Halo reach), but since the poll is asking Halo 4, I don't know since it isn't even out yet (Bf3 ftw).
i would like halo if when i jumped i didn't fly around everywhere and i could aim down sights
also battlefield is an ok game, but it's like lucoza said, they just up the graphics mostly
(no im not just saying this, i have bf2 and 3 ok)
MW2 caught on and people didn't stop playing it because it was the newest out COD game, but everybody had something in that game that pissed them off. Models 1918 (that's what they were called?) were just OP and eventually got the patch they needed. Intervention got a patch and was still the same. But boosters, my lord, boosters.
MW3 is just a follow-on game, couple of new features, but in the long run it's just another MW2.
Well, I like Battlefield 3 for the gameplay. It is better, and it feels more realistic.
Also, it has vehicles such as jets, helicopters, tanks, etc.
The classes, squads, maps..
Well, in general I prefer Battefield 3. I don't care at all about graphics.
About Halo, I don't know why I like it so much, I used to play it a lot..
Then, started playing CoD, after that Bf3, and now Minecraft (lolwut).
Neither. That whole type of gaming was great up until a few years back, when it got complicated with a billion challenges and crappy maps, along with stupid gun upgrades and currencies. It pains me to say this, but CoD, Halo, and Battlefield are just worn out. I'll gladly stick with another game series.
lucoza make good posts lucoza posts get thank
So you're saying gaming was BETTER years ago? That's so wrong... okay the classics were back then which actually made gaming into what it is now, but video games have gotten so much better as we discovered new technologies.
I'm not attacking you or your opinions, I am just giving my own two cents on what people say about games that piss me off.
ARMA 2 only got popular because of DayZ [which is awesome BTW] however if that mod wasn't made ARMA 2 is a pile of titties.
Shades of colors are all I see
Shapes and colors are all I feel
Roses are red, You better get ready.
Bend your ass over, UR GETTING SPAGHETTI
If Microsoft didn't take away Bungie's passion, and Bungie had actually made a game that they wanted to make, instead of being forced to make crap that Microsoft wanted, then it would have been much better.
Let's just say that Halo 4 will be the game that Reach never was.
Shades of colors are all I see
Shapes and colors are all I feel
Roses are red, You better get ready.
Bend your ass over, UR GETTING SPAGHETTI
Um, you don't think getting the kill streak takes skill? Just because you heard some people say bad stuff about COD doesn't mean you have to say it which by the way it's total bullturd. I actually don't know what to say back I'm so ashamed...
How does calling in a kill streak make someone a noob?
Reach was bad for HALO, I can agree on that.
HALO: Re4ch.![]()