not sure if a joke, a troll, or a failOriginally Posted by -Sneezie-
yes
maybe im not sure but i guess it could be real
no
no but if yes this god is a jerk
yes but i do wonder sometimes if its true
not sure if a joke, a troll, or a fail
You found an easter egg! Code: 👆👆👆👆
It's the truth
Not someone, something.
'If they're exists, so someone created them,' No, to establish something was created by someone its mere existance is not sufficient grounds. If you did assume that you'd begin an infinite regression- who created the 'someone' ...and who created that person?
Common responses are 'the original creator is special so they don't need a creator'...that rather dismantles the premice.
It's special pleading, not a logical argument, so you are correct you haven't proven anything.
A world with no churces, mosques, gurdwaras etcetera would not necessarily suck; there are plenty of things that aren't religious which are enjoyable and amazing about our world, whether or not you find religion enjoyable has no relation to whether or not its claims are justifiable- which is the point of this discussion.
*Gives the creator a slap on the ass*
Raar!
So basically you're trying to say scientists are evil even though they have improved our lives beyond measure and provided you with the technology you're using as of this moment.
Furthermore not all scientists are atheists and not all scientists believe in global warming and whatever else.
Statistically
-97% of climate scientists accept anthropogenic climate change.
-Levels of belief in a god or religion are substantially lower amongst scientists than they are normal people.
-Levles of belief in a god or religion vary between different scientific disciplines and are generally lowest in Physics.
However it should be highlighted that even scientists who believe in a god or religion still accept the same scientific disciplines and theory as their bretherin- scientists who believe in yahweh don't necessarily challenge evolution.
Raar!
Actually buddhism can be considered as a Polythiestic and monothiestic religion depending on what branch of Buddhism your talking about ._.
Page 302 and the discussion hasn't ended.
░█▀▀█ ▒█░▄▀ ▀█▀ ▒█░▒█ ▒█▀▀▀
▒█▄▄█ ▒█▀▄░ ▒█░ ▒█░▒█ ▒█▀▀▀
▒█░▒█ ▒█░▒█ ▄█▄ ░▀▄▄▀ ▒█▄▄▄
you fail
It's page 604 dummy
besides, It going to go on and on and on because of next generation JVers, so you should get used to it
Last edited by ponk; 23rd July 2012 at 06:07 PM. Reason: i win
I never said that. Scientist just don't tell the truth about this world, how it was made, whats gonna happen to it, etc. They have greatly improved our lives with technology, and i appreciate them doing it. Their theories are just not true
I'm talking about the versions of buddhism with no higher powers.
The technology, which is based on theory, would not work if the theories were not at least approximations of reality.
Transistors work because theories which describe the existance and motion of tiny electrons work
Satellites stay in orbit because theories which describe their motion work
New antiobiotics are developed and work because theories which describe the process by which bacteria construct their cell walls and how they adapt over time to gain immunity to drugs work
etcetera, the technology and applied science you appreciate and rely on to survive is built in the same fashion and much of the time the same data that pure science theories which describe reality are.
Last edited by Rammjet; 23rd July 2012 at 06:48 PM.
Raar!
You mean 4cancer? Reddit sucks too.
These three are just the toilets of the internet.
Oops I forgot unfunny junk.
I may be stupid but I'm not an idiot.
Unfunnyjunk: 100% chance to steal your content and then demand money for stealing your content!
Jacob Grahn is a descendant of Jesus Christ.
Srsly.
If their theories are lies then how come they work?
Bold = facepalm
If evolution is a lie scientists told us then how come farmers have been using it to breed cows and other animals for hundreds, maybe thousands of years?
Reply With Quote
Jerk.