Blackie6789
Inactive.

You might be interested in my latest blog.

1337 posts :3

1337 posts

Thanks!!

[whether a polymer is hydrolysed in water depends on its chemical properties, that's why sheep's coats don't 'melt off' when it rains. It's actually rather difficult to design polymers which dissolve in water, such as the synthetic plastics used in hospitals for waste disposal.]

'Mathematically, the odds of amino acids naturally bonding together to form a fairly simple protein is one chance in 10^125.'

Chemically*, the probability of amino acids naturally bonding together is 1, because the chemical environment we live in favours polymerisation.

*I want to emphasise it's chemical properties which matter here, rather than adding up all the acids in a protein and raising them to the power of the variety of acids regardless of their properties.

You see, what you've done, is been a wee bit short sighted. I, and other people who actually know a thing or two, get their definitions from dictionaries, rather than inserting our own beliefs into defenitions.

You've just produced a no true scot fallacy- which hinges around 'evolution must include and necessitate the belief life originated in a certain way'
Just like the no true scot fallacy, scottish people may wear kilts, but wearing trousers doesn't suddenly mean they can't be scottish.

Oh, maybe I should get back on PR3 too; my skills are kind of declining.

Does it not even occur to you that if you describe a triceratops to someone [big horn on the nose, armoured flesh, quadrupedic, 2 tonnes], who has seen a rhino, that they will of course think you're talking about a rhino.

What's the rational answer, that a widely documented animal species, the rhino, exists, or that you've magiced dinosaurs back into existance?